Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHusk, K
dc.contributor.authorElston, J
dc.contributor.authorGradinger, F
dc.contributor.authorCallaghan, L
dc.contributor.authorAsthana, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-30T18:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.issn0960-1643
dc.identifier.issn1478-5242
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13103
dc.description.abstract

Social prescribing is the topic of the moment. Many national organisations and individuals from policy, practice, and academia (such as NHS England, the RCGP, the Mayor of London, and National Institute for Health Research) are rightly advocating social prescriptions as an important way to expand the options available for GPs and other community-based practitioners to provide individualised care for people’s physical and mental health through social interventions. No robust figures exist but it is thought that around 20% of patients consult their GP for primarily social issues, given this and the driving forces of an ageing population, increased complex health and social needs, and increasing demand on services, social prescribing is rapidly gaining popularity.As a concept and a model for delivering health and social interventions, social prescribing has proliferated without a concomitant evidence base.1 This is partly due to resource limitations on evaluators and partly due to difficulties in conceptualising what social prescribing is and what good evidence for a complex service might look like. Here, we briefly outline different models of social prescribing, the current evidence base and its limitations, explore problems relating to what constitutes good evidence, and discuss some potential ways forward.An immediate difficulty is the range of activity that the term ‘social prescribing’ embraces. Such heterogeneity is a function of social prescribing being the demand-driven formalisation of referrals to existing community services and organisations, which is necessarily locally different. More generally, at one extreme there are narrow interventions that focus on one clinical area and aim to prevent or reduce progression to chronic disease. Such interventions tend to include targeted life-style interventions (for example physical activity, healthy eating or cooking), medicines management or group mentoring, and are typically accessed through the healthcare system. At the other extreme, a large number of schemes are …

dc.format.extent6-7
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitioners
dc.subjectCommunity Health Services
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Practice
dc.subjectHealth Promotion
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Physicians'
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.subjectProgram Evaluation
dc.subjectSocial Participation
dc.titleSocial prescribing: where is the evidence? Commissioned editorial
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJOUR
plymouth.author-urlhttp://bjgp.org/content/69/678/6.abstract
plymouth.issue678
plymouth.volume69
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19x700325
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Journal of General Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp19X700325
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-06
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-27
dc.identifier.eissn1478-5242
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3399/bjgp19X700325
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV