Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStephens, R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-08T13:00:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-19T12:21:51Z
dc.date.available2018-11-08T13:00:29Z
dc.date.available2018-11-19T12:21:51Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation

Stephens, R. (2008) 'The Relationship Between Preference and Performance Measures of Handedness', 1 (1), p. 63-94

en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-2383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12805
dc.description.abstract

There is great debate as to the way in which preference and performance measures of handedness are related. Some suggest that they are separable dimensions (e.g. Porac & Coren, 1981), however a bulk of evidence suggests otherwise (Annett, 1970b; 1976; 1985). The study aimed to discover whether any of three tasks were better captured by the EHI (Oldfield, 1971). Participants completed all three performance tasks and the EHI. Results suggest that performance measures tapping more practiced abilities may be better captured by preference inventories. Implications of the findings and how preference and performance measures might be related are discussed. How performance measures relate to different types of handedness dichotomies derived from the EHI are also discussed.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Preference and Performance Measures of Handednessen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume1
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV