Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerkley, N
dc.contributor.authorHanley, M
dc.contributor.authorBoden, R
dc.contributor.authorOwen, R
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, J
dc.contributor.authorCritchley, R
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, K
dc.contributor.authorSawyer, D
dc.contributor.authorParmesan, C
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-05T11:25:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.issn1757-1707
dc.identifier.issn1757-1707
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12461
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Compared to traditional arable crops, second‐generation perennial energy crops (PECs) are generally associated with increased biodiversity and ecosystem services, but robust experimental studies on this subject are few. Consequently, the potential for PEC cultivation to contribute to enhanced pollination processes in adjacent farmland remains unclear. In a 4‐year field study across multiple sites and two PECs (<jats:italic>Miscanthus x giganteus</jats:italic> and willow short‐rotation coppice), we examine whether pollinator visits to crop margin wildflowers were augmented by PEC cultivation. Each field was paired with two cereal fields, one adjacent to the PEC and one distant, and we recorded wildflower visits to crop margins by three pollinator groups: hoverflies, bumblebees and butterflies/moths. We also quantified floral resources, since crop‐specific management seemed a likely means of influencing margin wildflowers and thus pollinator activity. Our results add quantitative support to the suggestion that PECs should enhance ecosystem processes in agri‐landscapes. However, benefits were highly context‐dependent. Consistent enhancement of pollinator activity in margins of PEC fields was only apparent for willow where the relative frequency of flower visitation was higher for all three pollinator groups compared to adjacent or distant cereals. This distribution was most likely positively associated with the increased availability of preferred food plants in willow margins. In <jats:italic>Miscanthus</jats:italic>, by contrast, opposing trends arose for different pollinator taxa: Lepidoptera were the only pollinator group more frequently associated with PEC margins; bumblebees showed no variation while hoverflies were comparatively more abundant in distant cereal margins than in other crop types. Future land‐use practices should consider how PEC identity affects both target species and ecosystem processes. Tackling anthropogenic climate change through cultivation of willow, in particular, may yield local conservation benefits for both wildflowers and pollinators, although strategic cultivation of PECs to enhance pollination processes in the wider agri‐environment may not be achievable.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent960-971
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley Open Access
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.subjectbiodiversity
dc.subjectbioenergy
dc.subjectbiofuel
dc.subjectconservation
dc.subjectMiscanthus
dc.subjectpollination
dc.subjectwillow short-rotation coppice
dc.titleInfluence of bioenergy crops on pollinator activity varies with crop type and distance
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000449495600004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue12
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalGCB Bioenergy
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcbb.12565
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA06 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-07-24
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-7
dc.identifier.eissn1757-1707
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/gcbb.12565
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV