Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEustice, Sen
dc.contributor.authorEndacott, Ren
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Jen
dc.contributor.authorShankar, Ren
dc.contributor.authorKent, Ben
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T06:55:02Z
dc.date.available2018-09-04T06:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-08en
dc.identifier.issn2054-2704en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12223
dc.description.abstract

The aim of this paper was to consider the available evidence for the current management of pelvic organ prolapse, which is a common presentation in primary care. However, not all women will present, only presenting when symptoms become bothersome. Particular attention was paid to understanding the problem of rectocele and its influence on obstructive defaecation symptoms. The burden of rectocele and its consequences are not truly known. Furthermore, healthcare professionals may not always enquire about bowel symptoms and patients may not disclose them. Complex emotions around coping and managing stress add to the challenges with seeking healthcare. Therefore, the impact on the lived experience of women who have difficulty with rectal emptying can be significant. The review identified a dearth of knowledge about women living with the problem of obstructive defaecation resulting in the use of digitation. Improving the management of digitation, an under-reported problem, is necessary to improve the quality of life for women. Primary care needs to increase access to conservative measures for women struggling with bothersome symptoms, such as constipation, the need to digitate or anxiety.

en
dc.format.extent2054270418783616 - ?en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectdifficulty emptyingen
dc.subjectdigitationen
dc.subjectobstructive defaecationen
dc.subjectpelvic organ prolapseen
dc.subjectprimary careen
dc.subjectrectoceleen
dc.titleWomen's experiences of managing digitation: do we ask enough in primary care?en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094048en
plymouth.issue8en
plymouth.volume9en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalJRSM Openen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2054270418783616en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Professional Services staff
dc.publisher.placeEnglanden
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/2054270418783616en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV