Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEndacott, R
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-26T15:34:27Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-04
dc.identifier.issn1322-7696
dc.identifier.issn1876-7575
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11600
dc.description.abstract

Background: Enrolled Nurses constitute an important part of the Australian health care system. Recently, improvements to education and medication endorsement have initiated expansion to EN scope of practice. Aim: This paper reports on a study conducted to inform development of revised Nursing and Midwifery Board (NMBA) of Australia Enrolled Nurse practice standards that explored with ENs their scope of practice. Design: A qualitative design using focus groups and individual interviews with ENs across Australia. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: ENs work in diverse practice contexts with differing scope of practice. Confusion existed regarding EN scope of practice as a result of many different types of ENs in practice. Care of unstable patients was seen to be outside the EN scope of practice. They were also often required to supervise the work of nursing assistants and new registered nurses. Lack of career pathway was seen as a limitation to ENs. Conclusions: EN education and scope of practice has evolved significantly, particularly in many practice settings, since the existing standards were developed. Further work is needed to address issues related to EN supervision of new RNs and AINs (Assistants in Nursing), and clarity of EN supervision in specialist clinical areas.

dc.format.extent80-85
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectEnrolled nurse
dc.subjectFocus group
dc.subjectQualitative
dc.subjectScope of practice
dc.subjectSecond level nurse
dc.subjectWorkforce
dc.titleScope of practice and workforce issues confronting Australian Enrolled Nurses: A qualitative analysis.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000460754300013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume26
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalCollegian
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.colegn.2018.04.001
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-04-02
dc.rights.embargodate2019-5-4
dc.identifier.eissn1876-7575
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.colegn.2018.04.001
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-05-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV