Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaslin, Kate
dc.contributor.authorGrimshaw, K
dc.contributor.authorOliver, E
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, G
dc.contributor.authorArshad, SH
dc.contributor.authorDean, T
dc.contributor.authorGrundy, J
dc.contributor.authorGlasbey, G
dc.contributor.authorVenter, C
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T10:42:01Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T10:42:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.issn1365-277X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11483
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Taste exposure in infancy is known to predict food preferences later in childhood. This is particularly relevant in children with cows’ milk allergy who consume a substitute formula and/or a cows’ milk exclusion (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content>) diet early in life. This prospective study aimed to show whether there is a long‐term effect of consuming a substitute formula and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content> diet on taste preferences and dietary intake.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Children were predominantly recruited from two large birth cohort studies in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">UK</jats:styled-content>. Two groups were recruited: an experimental group of children who had consumed a <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content> diet during infancy and a control group who had consumed an unrestricted diet during infancy. Parents completed a food neophobia questionnaire and an estimated prospective food diary. Children completed a taste preference test and their growth was assessed.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>One hundred and one children with a mean age of 11.5 years were recruited (28 <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content> and 73 controls). Children in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content> group had a significantly higher preference for bitter taste than those in the control group (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). There were significant differences between the groups with respect to the intake of some micronutrients, including riboflavin, iodine, sodium and selenium. Food neophobia did not differ between groups. Some 28% of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content> group were overweight/obese compared to 15% of the control group; however, this difference was not statistically significant.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Consuming a substitute formula and/or <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">a CME</jats:styled-content> diet in infancy has a long‐term effect on the preference for bitter taste. Differences exist with respect to the intake of some micronutrients, but not macronutrients. There was a nonsignificant trend towards being overweight and obese in children in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CME</jats:styled-content> group.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent786-796
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectcows' milk allergy
dc.subjectdietary intake
dc.subjectfood neophobia
dc.subjecttaste preference
dc.titleTaste preference, food neophobia and nutritional intake in children consuming a cows’ milk exclusion diet: a prospective study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000387849000012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume29
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhn.12387
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn1365-277X
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12387
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV