Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStewart, IS
dc.contributor.authorLewis, D
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-26T19:40:42Z
dc.date.available2018-02-26T19:40:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifier.issn0012-8252
dc.identifier.issn1872-6828
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10860
dc.description.abstract

Geological issues are increasingly intruding on the everyday lives of ordinary people. Whether it is the onshore extraction of oil and gas, the subsurface injection of waters for geothermal power or the deep storage of waste products, communities across the world are being confronted with controversial geological interventions beneath their backyards. Communicating these complex scientific and technical issues is made more challenging by the general public's unfamiliarity with the geological realm. Cognitive studies confirm a cultural dissonance with the subsurface and highlight lay anxieties about tampering with nature. In addressing those concerns, factual information is argued to be subordinate to values and beliefs in shaping public perspectives on contested geoscientific issues. In this context, scientists' attention to technical accuracy and their emphasis on professional consensus may do little to influence multiple publics whose worries instead root into their sense of place, trust and governance, as well as equity and ethics. With a growing recognition that it is social rather than technical factors that stir public unease and fuel community outrage, geoscientists need to develop new strategies to engage dissonant publics, underpinned by a culture change in geocommunication from conveying ‘matters of fact’ to brokering ‘matters of concern’.

dc.format.extent122-133
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subject37 Earth Sciences
dc.subject3709 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
dc.subject3705 Geology
dc.subject3706 Geophysics
dc.titleCommunicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.volume174
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalEarth-Science Reviews
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-05
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6828
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV