Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorINTEGRATE,
dc.contributor.authorChynoweth, J
dc.contributor.authorJones, BG
dc.contributor.authorStevens, K
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-19T14:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-27
dc.identifier.issn0022-2151
dc.identifier.issn1748-5460
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10618
dc.description.abstract

Background: Epistaxis is a common condition that can be associated with significant morbidity, and it places a considerable burden on our healthcare system. This national audit of management sought to assess current practice against newly created consensus recommendations and to expand our current evidence base. Methods: The management of epistaxis patients who met the inclusion criteria, at 113 registered sites across the UK, was compared with audit standards during a 30-day window. Data were further utilised for explorative analysis. Results: Data for 1826 cases were uploaded to the database, representing 94 per cent of all cases that met the inclusion criteria at participating sites. Sixty-two per cent of patients were successfully treated by ENT clinicians within 24 hours. The 30-day recurrent presentation rate across the dataset was 13.9 per cent. Significant event analysis revealed an all-cause 30-day mortality rate of 3.4 per cent. Conclusion: Audit findings demonstrate a varying alignment with consensus guidance, with explorative analysis countering some previously well-established tenets of management

dc.format.extent1131-1141
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.subjectEpistaxis
dc.subjectSymptom Assesment
dc.subjectCautery
dc.subjectHematology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleEpistaxis 2016: national audit of management
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29280693
plymouth.issue12
plymouth.volume131
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S002221511700202X
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-20
dc.rights.embargodate2018-6-27
dc.identifier.eissn1748-5460
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1017/S002221511700202X
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV