Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKent, B
dc.contributor.authorStreet, M
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, NM
dc.contributor.authorMohebbi, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-12T12:53:21Z
dc.date.available2018-01-12T12:53:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-03
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.otherARTN e015149
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10565
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>This study aimed to evaluate whether use of a discharge criteria tool for nursing assessment of patients in Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) would enhance nurses’ recognition and response to patients at-risk of deterioration and improve patient outcomes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A prospective non-randomised pre–post intervention study was conducted in three hospitals in Australia. Participants were adults undergoing elective surgery before (n=723) and after (n=694) implementation of the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Nursing response to patients at-risk of deterioration was higher using PACT, with more medical consultations initiated by PACU nurses (19% vs 30%, P&lt;0.001) and more patients with Medical Emergency Team activation criteria modified by an anaesthetist while in PACU (6.5% vs 13.8%, P&lt;0.001). There were higher rates of analgesia administration (37.3% vs 54.2%, P=0.001), nursing assessment of pain and documentation of ongoing analgesia prior to discharge (55% vs 85%, P&lt;0.001). More adverse events were recorded in PACU after introduction of the PACT (8.3% vs 16.7%, P&lt;0.001). The rate of adverse events after discharge from PACU remained constant (16.5%), but the rate of cardiac events (5.1% vs 2.6%, P=0.021) and clinical deterioration (8.7% vs 4.3%, P=0.001) following PACU discharge significantly decreased, using the PACT. Despite the increased number of patients with adverse events in phase 2, healthcare costs did not increase significantly. Length of stay in PACU and length of hospital admission for those patients who had an adverse event in PACU were significantly reduced after implementation of the PACT.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>This study found that using a structured discharge criteria tool, the PACT, enhanced nurses’ recognition and response to patients who experienced clinical deterioration, reduced length of stay for patients who experienced an adverse event in PACU and was cost-effective.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extente015149-e015149
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjecthealth Economics
dc.subjectsurgery
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAnesthesia Recovery Period
dc.subjectAustralia
dc.subjectElective Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLength of Stay
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNursing Assessment
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment, Health Care
dc.subjectPatient Discharge
dc.subjectPostoperative Care
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Nurses'
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.titleEffect of a newly designed observation, response and discharge chart in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit on patient outcomes: a quasi-experimental study in Australia
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000423826700010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue12
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015149
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-10-23
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015149
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV