Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDismore, Harriet
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-27T15:54:39Z
dc.date.available2017-11-27T15:54:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-02
dc.identifier.issn1363-9080
dc.identifier.issn1469-9435
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10299
dc.description.abstract

It is the intention of the UK government to enhance progression routes for apprentices to higher education. However, little research has been carried out into why former apprentices pursue higher education or the experiences of this transition. This paper seeks to redress this gap by reporting three case studies of former apprentices who had completed or were completing a higher education qualification in England. Each case study represents a different route to higher education: progressing to a full-time higher education course; pursuing a part-time route to sustain full-time employment; and undertaking a career change during the transition to higher education. The paper addresses their experiences of the apprenticeship, the decision-making to progress and the perceived outcomes of their transition so far. Analysis draws on Fuller and Unwin’s expansive–restrictive framework and conceptual lenses for understanding learning. The findings revealed that although their apprenticeships were restrictive in different ways, progression was pursued for a number of reasons involving the context in which apprenticeships were completed, the relationship to their employer, the higher education context and their understanding of learning. Experiences of boundary crossing were particularly associated with more complex descriptions of personal transformation and learning as becoming.

dc.format.extent585-607
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.subject4 Quality Education
dc.titleExperiencing the transition from an apprenticeship to higher education
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume27
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Education and Work
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13639080.2013.802831
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1469-9435
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/13639080.2013.802831
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV