Authors

Timothy R. Baker, University of Leeds
Michelle O. Johnson, University of Leeds
David Galbraith, University of Leeds
Manuel Gloor, University of Leeds
Deurwaerder H De
Matthieu Guimberteau, Sorbonne Université
Anja Rammig, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Kirsten Thonicke, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Hans Verbeeck, Ghent University
Randow C von
Abel Monteagudo, Jardín Botánico de Missouri
Oliver L. Phillips, University of Leeds
Roel J.W. Brienen, University of Leeds
Ted R. Feldpausch, University of Exeter
Gonzalez G Lopez
Sophie Fauset, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
Carlos A. Quesada, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
Bradley Christoffersen, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Philippe Ciais, Université Paris-Saclay
Gilvan Sampaio, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
Bart Kruijt, Wageningen University & Research
Patrick Meir, Australian National University
Paul Moorcroft, Harvard University
Ke Zhang, University of Oklahoma
E Alvarez‐Davila
de Oliveira A Alves
Ieda Amaral, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
Ana Andrade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
Luiz E.O.C. Aragao, Jardín Botánico de Missouri
A Araujo‐Murakami
Luzmila Arroyo
Gerardo A. Aymard
Christopher Baraloto
Jocely Barroso
Damien Bonal
Rene Boot
Jose Camargo
Jerome Chave
Alvaro Cogollo
Valverde F Cornejo
da Costa AC Lola
Fiore A Di
Leandro Ferreira
Niro Higuchi
Euridice N. Honorio
Tim J. Killeen
SG Laurance
WF Laurance
Juan Licona
Thomas Lovejoy
Yadvinder Malhi
B Marimon
BH Marimon
Darley C.L. Matos
Casimiro Mendoza
David A. Neill
Guido Pardo
M Peña‐Claros
Nigel C.A. Pitman
Lourens Poorter
Adriana Prieto
H Ramirez‐Angulo
Anand Roopsind
Agustin Rudas
Rafael P. Salomao
Marcos Silveira
Juliana Stropp
Steege H ter
John Terborgh
Raquel Thomas
Marisol Toledo
A Torres‐Lezama
der Heijden GMF van
Rodolfo Vasquez
Vieira IC Guimarães
Emilio Vilanova
Vincent A. Vos
Timothy R. Baker

ORCID

Abstract

AbstractUnderstanding the processes that determine above‐ground biomass (AGB) in Amazonian forests is important for predicting the sensitivity of these ecosystems to environmental change and for designing and evaluating dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). AGB is determined by inputs from woody productivity [woody net primary productivity (NPP)] and the rate at which carbon is lost through tree mortality. Here, we test whether two direct metrics of tree mortality (the absolute rate of woody biomass loss and the rate of stem mortality) and/or woody NPP, control variation in AGB among 167 plots in intact forest across Amazonia. We then compare these relationships and the observed variation in AGB and woody NPP with the predictions of four DGVMs. The observations show that stem mortality rates, rather than absolute rates of woody biomass loss, are the most important predictor of AGB, which is consistent with the importance of stand size structure for determining spatial variation in AGB. The relationship between stem mortality rates and AGB varies among different regions of Amazonia, indicating that variation in wood density and height/diameter relationships also influences AGB. In contrast to previous findings, we find that woody NPP is not correlated with stem mortality rates and is weakly positively correlated with AGB. Across the four models, basin‐wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations. However, the models consistently overestimate woody NPP and poorly represent the spatial patterns of both AGB and woody NPP estimated using plot data. In marked contrast to the observations, DGVMs typically show strong positive relationships between woody NPP and AGB. Resolving these differences will require incorporating forest size structure, mechanistic models of stem mortality and variation in functional composition in DGVMs.

Publication Date

2016-01-01

Publication Title

Global Change Biology

Volume

22

Issue

12

ISSN

1354-1013

First Page

3996

Last Page

4013

10.1111/gcb.13315" data-hide-no-mentions="true">

Share

COinS