Authors

Katrin Schmidt, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
Martin Graeve, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Clara J.M. Hoppe, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
S Torres‐Valdes
Nahid Welteke, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Laura M. Whitmore, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Philipp Anhaus, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Angus Atkinson, Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Simon T. Belt, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
Tina Brenneis, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Robert G. Campbell, University of Rhode Island
Giulia Castellani, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Louise A. Copeman, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Hauke Flores, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Allison A. Fong, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Nicole Hildebrandt, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Doreen Kohlbach, Norwegian Polar Institute
Jens M. Nielsen, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Christopher C. Parrish, Memorial University of Newfoundland
C Rad‐Menéndez
Sebastian D. Rokitta, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Sandra Tippenhauer, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Yanpei Zhuang, Jimei University

ORCID

Abstract

Microalgae are the main source of the omega‐3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), essential for the healthy development of most marine and terrestrial fauna including humans. Inverse correlations of algal EPA and DHA proportions (% of total fatty acids) with temperature have led to suggestions of a warming‐induced decline in the global production of these biomolecules and an enhanced importance of high latitude organisms for their provision. The cold Arctic Ocean is a potential hotspot of EPA and DHA production, but consequences of global warming are unknown. Here, we combine a full‐seasonal EPA and DHA dataset from the Central Arctic Ocean (CAO), with results from 13 previous field studies and 32 cultured algal strains to examine five potential climate change effects; ice algae loss, community shifts, increase in light, nutrients, and temperature. The algal EPA and DHA proportions were lower in the ice‐covered CAO than in warmer peripheral shelf seas, which indicates that the paradigm of an inverse correlation of EPA and DHA proportions with temperature may not hold in the Arctic. We found no systematic differences in the summed EPA and DHA proportions of sea ice versus pelagic algae, and in diatoms versus non‐diatoms. Overall, the algal EPA and DHA proportions varied up to four‐fold seasonally and 10‐fold regionally, pointing to strong light and nutrient limitations in the CAO. Where these limitations ease in a warming Arctic, EPA and DHA proportions are likely to increase alongside increasing primary production, with nutritional benefits for a non‐ice‐associated food web.

Publication Date

2024-01-01

Publication Title

Global Change Biology

Volume

30

Issue

1

ISSN

1354-1013

Embargo Period

2024-01-27

Keywords

Bering Sea, Central Arctic Ocean, DHA, EPA, MOSAiC expedition, Melosira arctica, ice algae, light, nutrients, temperature

10.1111/gcb.17090" data-hide-no-mentions="true">

Share

COinS