Authors

Simeon L. Hill, British Antarctic Survey
Angus Atkinson, Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Javier A. Arata, Association of Responsible Krill Harvesting Companies (ARK)
Anna Belcher, British Antarctic Survey
Susan Bengtson Nash, Griffith University Queensland
Kim S. Bernard, Oregon State University
Alison Cleary, British Antarctic Survey
John A. Conroy, College of William and Mary
Ryan Driscoll, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Sophie Fielding, British Antarctic Survey
Hauke Flores, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Jaume Forcada, British Antarctic Survey
Svenja Halfter, NIWA
Jefferson T. Hinke, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Luis Hückstädt, University of California at Santa Cruz
Nadine M. Johnston, British Antarctic Survey
Mary Kane, Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies
So Kawaguchi, Korea Polar Research Institute
Bjørn A. Krafft, Institute of Marine Research
Lucas Krüger, Instituto Antártico Chileno
Hyoung Sul La, Korea Polar Research Institute
Cecilia M. Liszka, British Antarctic Survey
Bettina Meyer, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Eugene J. Murphy, British Antarctic Survey
Evgeny A. Pakhomov, University of British Columbia
Frances Perry, Marine Biological Association
Andrea Piñones, Universidad Austral de Chile
Michael J. Polito, Louisiana State University
Keith Reid, Ross Analytics
Christian Reiss, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Abstract

Understanding and managing the response of marine ecosystems to human pressures including climate change requires reliable large-scale and multi-decadal information on the state of key populations. These populations include the pelagic animals that support ecosystem services including carbon export and fisheries. The use of research vessels to collect information using scientific nets and acoustics is being replaced with technologies such as autonomous moorings, gliders, and meta-genetics. Paradoxically, these newer methods sample pelagic populations at ever-smaller spatial scales, and ecological change might go undetected in the time needed to build up large-scale, long time series. These global-scale issues are epitomised by Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), which is concentrated in rapidly warming areas, exports substantial quantities of carbon and supports an expanding fishery, but opinion is divided on how resilient their stocks are to climatic change. Based on a workshop of 137 krill experts we identify the challenges of observing climate change impacts with shifting sampling methods and suggest three tractable solutions. These are to: improve overlap and calibration of new with traditional methods; improve communication to harmonise, link and scale up the capacity of new but localised sampling programs; and expand opportunities from other research platforms and data sources, including the fishing industry. Contrasting evidence for both change and stability in krill stocks illustrates how the risks of false negative and false positive diagnoses of change are related to the temporal and spatial scale of sampling. Given the uncertainty about how krill are responding to rapid warming we recommend a shift towards a fishery management approach that prioritises monitoring of stock status and can adapt to variability and change.

Publication Date

2024-03-08

Publication Title

Frontiers in Marine Science

Volume

11

Keywords

Antarctic kill, ecosystem monitoring, fishery management, new technologies, population change

10.3389/fmars.2024.1307402" data-hide-no-mentions="true">

Share

COinS