Erratum: How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:9 e0139783))

Authors

V. M. Nguyen
N. R. Haddaway
L. F.G. Gutowsky
A. D.M. Wilson, School of Biological and Marine Sciences
A. J. Gallagher
M. R. Donaldson

ORCID

• A. D.M. Wilson: 0000-0002-7696-1671

DOI Link

10.1371/journal.pone.0139783

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0139783

Publication Date

2015-09-29

Publication Title

PLoS ONE

Volume

10

Issue

9

ISSN

1932-6203

Recommended Citation

Nguyen, V., Haddaway, N., Gutowsky, L., Wilson, A., Gallagher, A., & Donaldson, M. (2015) 'Erratum: How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:9 e0139783))', PLoS ONE, 10(9). Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139783