Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: a case study from public health and environmental enhancement.

Authors

Chris Cooper, University of Exeter
Rebecca Lovell, University of Exeter
Kerryn Husk, Peninsula Medical School
Andrew Booth, University of Sheffield
Ruth Garside, University of Exeter

ORCID

• Kerryn Husk: 0000-0001-5674-8673

DOI

10.1002/jrsm.1286

Publication Date

2018-06-05

Publication Title

Research Synthesis Methods

Volume

2018

Issue

9

ISSN

1759-2879

Embargo Period

2018-11-29

Keywords

information science, literature searching, sensitivity analysis, Cochrane systematic reviews, Public health

First Page

195

Last Page

223

Recommended Citation

Cooper, C., Lovell, R., Husk, K., Booth, A., & Garside, R. (2018) 'Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: a case study from public health and environmental enhancement.', Research Synthesis Methods, 2018(9), pp. 195-223. Available at: 10.1002/jrsm.1286