The Only Game in Town' - But is it a Legal One? American Drone Strikes and International Law

Authors

James Kirton

Document Type

Article

Abstract

In 2002 a US Predator drone operating above Afghanistan's Paktia province spotted three men in Zhawar Kili, a complex slightly north of the infamous Tora Bora cave system, an area used by al-Qaeda leadership to train and regroup. One of the men was tall; supposedly the others were acting reverently towards him. Convinced the tall man was Osama bin Laden a Hellfire missile was fired from the Predator, killing all three men instantly. The tall man was not bin Laden. None of the men were even affiliated with al-Qaeda or the Taliban; they were simply civilians in the wrong place at the wrong time. This strike and many others that are all too similar raise a multitude of questions, both legal and moral, regarding the US lethal drone strike programme. This article attempts to examine the legal implications of US drone strikes; not only in Afghanistan, but further afield from the more traditional and accepted battlefields in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

Publication Date

2015-01-01

Publication Title

The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review

Volume

7

Issue

1

First Page

77

Last Page

112

ISSN

2054-149X

Deposit Date

March 2017

Embargo Period

2024-11-01

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Recommended Citation

Kirton, James (2015) "The Only Game in Town' - But is it a Legal One? American Drone Strikes and International Law," The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review: Vol. 7, Article 4.
Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/plcjr/vol7/iss1/4