The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This article explores the disparate jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the appellate courts of England and Wales in relation to Article 6 European Convention on Human Rights, the right to a fair trial. It examines the differing views of the UK and Strasbourg courts in relation to the right of confrontation and argues that in the absence of provision for reform, the statutory safeguards employed by the UK criminal justice system strike an appropriate balance between the rights of defendants and the rights of victims and witnesses in criminal trials.
Publication Date
2014-01-01
Publication Title
The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review
Volume
6
Issue
1
First Page
107
Last Page
126
ISSN
2054-149X
Deposit Date
March 2017
Embargo Period
2024-11-01
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Bird, James
(2014)
"Article 6 in the Supreme Court: Conflicting Views on the Right of Confrontation,"
The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review: Vol. 6, Article 3.
Available at:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/plcjr/vol6/iss1/3