The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This article examines the methodology behind an empirical study investigating the 'real life' role of criminal defence lawyers and their approach to ethical conflict resolution. Using a normative conceptual framework entitled the 'zealous advocate' model, the study involved interviews with defence practitioners. A central feature of the interviews was a method known as the 'vignette technique', which used hypothetical scenarios to simulate realistic 'conflict' situations for respondents to consider. This article summarises the theory behind the study, examines the methodological issues of empirical research with lawyers, examines the benefits and limitations of the 'vignette technique', and details the construction of the 'Professional Conduct Scenarios' which were used in the study.
Publication Date
2013-01-01
Publication Title
The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review
Volume
5
Issue
1
First Page
50
Last Page
71
ISSN
2054-149X
Deposit Date
March 2017
Embargo Period
2024-11-01
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Smith, Tom
(2013)
"Exploring 'Practical' Conceptions of the Role of the Criminal Defence Lawyer: A Methodological Overview,"
The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review: Vol. 5, Article 12.
Available at:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/plcjr/vol5/iss1/12