The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This paper, based upon 17 semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in video activism, examines the growing importance of visually documenting protest events for both activists and police organizations. It is argued that while visual recordings of protest events by activists may be useful in terms of securing safety, dissuading instances of police violence and in providing evidence against police misconduct, there are also unintended negative consequences of video-activism. These negative consequences include selfincrimination, the promotion of spirals of surveillance whereby the police video protestors, and the removal (at times with disproportionate force) of activists with recording devices from protest events to prevent visual documentation of police activities. Thus the practice of video activism at protest events is one with the potential for both negative and positive outcomes in terms of activist aims.
Publication Date
2012-01-01
Publication Title
The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review
Volume
4
Issue
1
First Page
33
Last Page
42
ISSN
2054-149X
Deposit Date
March 2017
Embargo Period
2024-11-01
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Wilson, Dean
(2012)
"Counter-Surveillance, Protest and Policing,"
The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review: Vol. 4, Article 1.
Available at:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/plcjr/vol4/iss1/1