The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This paper seeks to identify and examine the extent to which there are substantive differences between the common law and equitable tests for non-contractual mistaken transfers. As the title suggests, the discussion references the case of Pitt v Holt as invoking the analogy of law and equity being 'pitted' against each other.
Publication Date
2019-01-01
Publication Title
The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review
Volume
11
Issue
1
First Page
58
Last Page
72
ISSN
2054-149X
Deposit Date
June 2019
Embargo Period
2024-11-04
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Graham, Tom
(2019)
"Pitted Against Each Other? Mistaken Transactions in Unjust Enrichment and Equity,"
The Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review: Vol. 11, Article 1.
Available at:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/plcjr/vol11/iss1/1
COinS
