ORCID

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise findings from qualitative studies exploring patients' experiences in hospital or at home following open-heart surgery.Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, and Web of Science, covering the period from 2006 to 2023. Studies were selected if they reported a qualitative inquiry into patients’ experiences after open-heart surgery. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool. A meta-aggregation approach was used to synthesise the findings.Results: Twenty-one studies were included, representing 266 patients across 10 countries. Findings were aggregated into five synthesised findings: 1) information and education needs; 2) adaptation to post-surgical life and financial considerations; 3) support mechanisms; 4) the paradox in lifestyle adjustments post-surgery; 5) recovery trajectory and patient perception of life. These findings highlight the complex nature of recovery, emphasising educational and support needs. Patients maintained a positive stance towards their surgical outcomes, viewing the surgery as an opportunity for health revival. They viewed the surgery as an appreciation for their lives and those around them.Conclusions: While the findings offer valuable insights into the patient’s physical and social well-being following open-heart surgery, they underscore the necessity of patient education, tailored support, and holistic care. Establishing a comprehensive support system by encompassing family members, healthcare professionals, and spiritual resources is imperative for effectively addressing the multifaceted challenges encountered during recovery.PROSPERO registration: CRD42023427805

Publication Date

2025-09-24

Publication Title

Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing

Volume

33

Issue

1

Acceptance Date

2025-06-10

Deposit Date

2025-06-17

Funding

Halil Kaya is supported by a PhD studentship from the Republic of Turkey's Ministry of National Education. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of National Education, the Ministry of Higher Education in Turkey, or the University of Plymouth. The funding body had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, or the preparation and submission of this manuscript for publication.

Keywords

Experiences, patients, perceptions, qualitative research, review, thoracic surgery

First Page

1

Last Page

22

Download

Share

COinS