Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCattani, Allegra
dc.contributor.authorAbbot-Smith, K
dc.contributor.authorFarag, R
dc.contributor.authorKrott, A
dc.contributor.authorArreckx, F
dc.contributor.authorDennis, I
dc.contributor.authorFloccia, Caroline
dc.contributor.editorBloch B
dc.contributor.editorBotting N
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-22T12:21:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T13:05:23Z
dc.date.available2015-06-22T12:21:30Z
dc.date.available2017-09-18T13:05:23Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1368-2822
dc.identifier.issn1460-6984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9949
dc.description.abstract

Background: Bilingual children are under-referred due to an ostensible expectation that they lag behind their monolingual peers in their English acquisition. The recommendations of the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (RCSLT) state that bilingual children should be assessed in both the languages known by the children. However, despite these recommendations, a majority of speech and language professionals report that they assess bilingual children only in English as bilingual children come from a wide array of language backgrounds and standardized language measures are not available for the majority of these. Moreover, even when such measures do exist, they are not tailored for bilingual children. Aims: It was asked whether a cut-off exists in the proportion of exposure to English at which one should expect a bilingual toddler to perform as well as a monolingual on a test standardized for monolingual English-speaking children. Methods & Procedures: Thirty-five bilingual 2;6-year-olds exposed to British English plus an additional language and 36 British monolingual toddlers were assessed on the auditory component of the Preschool Language Scale, British Picture Vocabulary Scale and an object-naming measure. All parents completed the Oxford Communicative Development Inventory (Oxford CDI) and an exposure questionnaire that assessed the proportion of English in the language input. Where the CDI existed in the bilingual’s additional language, these data were also collected. Outcomes & Results: Hierarchical regression analyses found the proportion of exposure to English to be the main predictor of the performance of bilingual toddlers. Bilingual toddlers who received 60% exposure to English or more performed like their monolingual peers on all measures. K-means cluster analyses and Levene variance tests confirmed the estimated English exposure cut-off at 60% for all language measures. Finally, for one additional language for which we had multiple participants, additional language CDI production scores were significantly inversely related to the amount of exposure to English. Conclusions & Implications: Typically developing 2;6-year-olds who are bilingual in English and an additional language and who hear English 60% of the time or more, perform equivalently to their typically developing monolingual peers.

dc.format.extent649-671
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3380
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/3380
dc.subjectbilingualism
dc.subjectlexicon
dc.subjectlanguage delay
dc.subjectassessment
dc.titleHow much exposure to English is necessary for a bilingual toddler to perform like a monolingual peer in language tests?
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000344372000002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.edition2014
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume49
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1460-6984.12082
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Cognition
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-12-30
dc.identifier.eissn1460-6984
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/1460-6984.12082
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2014
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderLexicon development in bilingual toddler::ESRC


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV