Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiquel, AMen
dc.contributor.authorAntonini, Aen
dc.contributor.authorArchetti, Ren
dc.contributor.authorBozzi, Sen
dc.contributor.authorLamberti, Aen
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-15T13:29:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-01en
dc.identifier.issn2214-1669en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9933
dc.description.abstract

© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This paper presents a numerical model that simulates the behaviour of an offshore point absorber wave energy converter (WEC). The model receives 1st order irregular waves as input and delivers instantaneous displacements, velocities and power as output. The model outputs are strongly non-linear due to the nature of some parts of the device, such as the power take off system (PTO), the mooring wires and the drag forces exerted on the wet bodies. Two different devices are modelled, a two-body device consisting in a floating buoy attached to a linear generator placed at the sea bed and a three-body device, which also includes a submerged sphere located halfway from the float and the generator. For each device, the model takes into account either the heave mode only or the heave and surge modes combined. The devices have been tuned to the Mediterranean wave climate, taking particular attention to the floater dimensions and to the geometrical design of the PTO, which has been redesigned to adapt to the newly introduced surge conditions. For the two-body device, although the dynamic behaviour changes when the surge is included, no relevant differences are observed regarding the power production. When studying the three-body device, results show two clear trends. For high waves, the surge leads to a decrease in the production, whereas for smaller waves it affects positively the power absorption. Overall, the negative contribution is more relevant but also less frequent, leading to no substantial change in the power production. Including the surge mode in the model does not give significant variations in production rates and therefore, may be neglected only for energy production assessment. However, it should always be taken into account at the design stage.

en
dc.format.extent95 - 109en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleNon-linear modelling of a heaving point absorber: The surge effecten
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.volume19en
plymouth.publication-statusAccepteden
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Marine Energyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijome.2017.07.002en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA12 Engineering
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-17en
dc.rights.embargodate2018-07-22en
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 monthsen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ijome.2017.07.002en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-09-01en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV