Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArcher, Julian
dc.contributor.authorNunn, S
dc.contributor.authorRegan de Bere, Sam
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-27T12:35:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-22
dc.identifier.issn0168-8510
dc.identifier.issn1872-6054
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9866
dc.description.abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medical regulation is rapidly changing with claims that systems such as revalidation/relicensing will reassure the public. Yet the impact of such initiatives is unknown. METHODS: Using the principles of efficiency, calculability, predictability and control through technology, identified by Ritzer, and exampled by the McDonalds business model, we analyzed interviews with doctors between May 2012-Dec 2013 which focused on doctor experiences of appraisal and revalidation in SW England. RESULTS: The research found significant changes in appraisals since the launch of revalidation in December 2012. Appraisal has been standardized with a list of supporting information that must be collected by doctors. The success of implementation is measured in the numbers of appraisals completed but less is known about the quality of the appraisal itself. Such efficiencies have been supported by IT systems that themselves might be at risk of driving the process. DISCUSSION: There are potential advantages to McDonaldization including appraisals available to all, not just for doctors working in the NHS, and a potentially more appetizing recipe for their completion. As yet a state of McAppraisal has not been reached; with a complete transfer of trust in the doctor to trust in the appraisal process within revalidation. However policymakers will need to continue to ensure that regulatory initiatives, such as revalidation, are not just a process for their own sake.

dc.format.extent994-1000
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectAppraisal
dc.subjectMedical revalidation
dc.subjectPolicy development
dc.subjectProfessional regulation
dc.subjectRelicensing
dc.titleThe McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors' views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28756852
plymouth.issue9
plymouth.volume121
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalHealth Policy
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.006
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeIreland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-17
dc.rights.embargodate2018-7-22
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6054
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 months
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.006
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-07-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV