Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGask, L
dc.contributor.authorRogers, A
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, S
dc.contributor.authorSheaff, Rod
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-16T16:35:55Z
dc.date.available2017-08-16T16:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2008-03-26
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.other63
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9840
dc.description.abstract

Background: Little research attention has been given to attempts to implement organisational initiatives to improve quality of care for mental health care, where there is a high level of indeterminacy and clinical judgements are often contestable. This paper explores recent efforts made at an organisational level in England to improve the quality of primary care for people with mental health problems through the new institutional processes of 'clinical governance'. Methods: Framework analysis, based on the Normalisation Process Model (NPM), of attempts over a five year period to develop clinical governance for primary mental health services in Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). The data come from a longitudinal qualitative multiple case-study approach in a purposive sample of 12 PCTs, chosen to reflect a maximum variety of organisational contexts for mental health care provision. Results: The constant change within the English NHS provided a difficult context in which to attempt to implement 'clinical governance' or, indeed, to reconstruct primary mental health care. In the absence of clear evidence or direct guidance about what 'primary mental health care' should be, and a lack of actors with the power or skills to set about realising it, the actors in 'clinical governance' had little shared knowledge or understanding of their role in improving the quality of mental health care. There was a lack of ownership of 'mental health' as an integral, normalised part of primary care. Conclusion: Despite some achievements in regard to monitoring and standardisation of prescribing practice, mental health care in primary care seems to have so far largely eluded the gaze of 'clinical governance'. Clinical governance in English primary mental health care has not yet become normalised. We make some policy recommendations which we consider would assist in the process normalisation and suggest other contexts to which our findings might apply.

dc.format.extent1-10
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMental Health Services
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.subjectProgram Development
dc.subjectProgram Evaluation
dc.subjectQuality Assurance, Health Care
dc.subjectState Medicine
dc.subjectWorkforce
dc.titleBeyond the limits of clinical governance? The case of mental health in English primary care
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000254970300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue63
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/63
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMC Health Services Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-8-63
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeUK
dcterms.dateAccepted2008-03-26
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6963
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/1472-6963-8-63
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV