When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
Date
2016-07-20Author
Garner, P
Hopewell, S
Chandler, J
MacLehose, H
Schünemann, HJ
Akl, EA
Beyene, J
Chang, S
Churchill, R
Dearness, K
Guyatt, G
Lefebvre, C
Liles, B
Marshall, R
Martínez García, L
Mavergames, C
Nasser, Mona
Qaseem, A
Sampson, M
Soares-Weiser, K
Takwoingi, Y
Thabane, L
Trivella, M
Tugwell, P
Welsh, E
Wilson, EC
Subject
Advisory Committees Canada Checklist Consensus Guidelines as Topic Publishing Review Literature as Topic
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.
Collections
Publisher
BMJ
Place of Publication
England
Journal
BMJ
Volume
354
Pagination
i3507-i3507
Number
ARTN i3507
Recommended, similar items
The following license files are associated with this item: