Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBach, Pen
dc.contributor.authorSchenke, KCen
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-11T09:54:04Z
dc.date.available2017-08-11T09:54:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-01en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9766
dc.description.abstract

© 2017 The Authors Social and Personality Psychology Compass Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Action observation is central to human social interaction. It allows people to derive what mental states drive others' behaviour and coordinate (and compete) effectively with them. Although previous accounts have conceptualised this ability in terms of bottom-up (motoric or conceptual) matching processes, more recent evidence suggests that such mechanisms cannot account for the complexity and uncertainty of the sensory input, even in cases where computations should be much simpler (i.e., low-level vision). It has therefore been argued that perception in general, and social perception in particular, is better described as a process of top–down hypothesis testing. In such models, any assumption about others—their goals, attitudes, and beliefs—is translated into predictions of expected sensory input and compared with incoming stimulation. This allows perception and action to be based on these expectations or—in case of a mismatch—for one's prior assumptions to be revised until they are better aligned with the individual's behaviour. This article will give a (selective) review of recent research from experimental psychology and (social) neuroscience that supports such views, discuss the relevant underlying models, and current gaps in research. In particular, it will argue that much headway can be made when current research on predictive social perception is integrated with classic findings from social psychology, which have already shown striking effects of prior knowledge on the processing of other people's behaviour.

en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titlePredictive social perception: Towards a unifying framework from action observation to person knowledgeen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue7en
plymouth.volume11en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalSocial and Personality Psychology Compassen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/spc3.12312en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Brain
dc.identifier.eissn1751-9004en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargoen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/spc3.12312en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
plymouth.oa-locationhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spc3.12312/fullen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV