Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLowther, Jason
dc.contributor.authorSellick, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-08T14:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.issn0306-9400
dc.identifier.issn1943-0353
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9704
dc.descriptionpeerreview_statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope. aims_and_scope_url: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ralt20
dc.description.abstract

Plymouth Law School was an early adopter of the Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) credo, and embarked on a series of measures designed to embed sustainability in its law curricula, which have since been refined and developed. This article is intended to supplement the theoretical ESD discourse by offering a reflective assessment of our practice and experiences in embedding sustainability by utilising the Foundation subjects of Legal Systems and Skills and European Union Law. In the case of the latter, sustainability is embedded as a delivery vehicle through which students are encouraged to critically explore the practical operation and efficacy of EU enforcement methods, principally from the perspective of EU water policy and law. This builds upon engagement and exposure at level 4 and prior learning in the level 5 EU Law module itself. Importantly it also serves to cement the association of sustainability with legal imperatives and allows us to apply a different lens to sometimes abstract judicial creations such as direct effect and state liability within a tangible setting. Developing autonomy is an additional significant learning outcome of the programme. The approach we have developed is based on combining these two imperatives.

dc.format.extent307-320
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.subject4 Quality Education
dc.titleEmbedding sustainability literacy in the legal curriculum: reflections on the Plymouth model
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume50
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalThe Law Teacher
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03069400.2016.1240919
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-01
dc.rights.embargodate2018-6-20
dc.identifier.eissn1943-0353
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/03069400.2016.1240919
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV