Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPullen, K
dc.contributor.authorCollins, R
dc.contributor.authorStone, T
dc.contributor.authorCarter, H
dc.contributor.authorSadler, H
dc.contributor.authorCollinson, Avril
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T15:12:01Z
dc.date.available2017-07-14T15:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-06
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.issn1365-277X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9621
dc.descriptionPublisher policy: author can archive post-print on institutional repository after a 12 months embargo. Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used. Publisher source must be acknowledged with citation. Must link to publisher version.
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Malnutrition is a problem within hospitals, which impacts upon clinical outcomes. The present audit assesses whether a hospital menu meets the energy and protein standards recommended by the British Dietetic Association's (BDA) <jats:italic>Nutrition and Hydration Digest</jats:italic> and determines the contribution of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) and additional snacks.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Patients in a UK South West hospital were categorised as ‘nutritionally well’ or ‘nutritionally vulnerable’ in accordance with their Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score. Energy and protein content of food selected from the menu (‘menu choice’), menu food consumed (‘hospital intake’) and total food consumed including snacks (‘overall intake’) were calculated and compared with the standards.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In total<jats:bold>,</jats:bold> 93 patients were included. For ‘nutritionally well’ patients (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 81), energy and protein standards were met by 11.1% and 33.3% (‘menu choice’); 7.4% and 22.2% (‘hospital intake’); and 14.8% and 28.4% (‘overall intake’). For ‘nutritionally vulnerable’ patients (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 12), energy and protein standards were met by 0% and 8.3% (‘menu choice’); 0% and 8.3% (‘hospital intake’); and 8.3% and 16.7% (‘overall intake’). Ten percent of patients consumed ONS. Patients who consumed hospital snacks (34%) were more likely to meet the nutrient standards (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> ≤ 0.001).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The present audit demonstrated that most patients are not meeting the nutrient standards recommended by the BDA <jats:italic>Nutrition and Hydration Digest</jats:italic>. Recommendations include the provision of energy/protein‐dense snacks, as well as menu, offering ONS where clinically indicated, in addition to training for staff. A food services dietitian is ideally placed to lead this, forming a vital link between patients, caterers and clinical teams.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent178-187
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectenergy
dc.subjecthospital
dc.subjectmalnutrition
dc.subjectnutrition
dc.subjectprotein
dc.titleAre energy and protein requirements met in hospital?
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000427581700003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume31
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhn.12485
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-04-18
dc.rights.embargodate2018-6-6
dc.identifier.eissn1365-277X
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 months
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12485
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-06-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV