Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Kate
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T08:41:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T11:37:26Z
dc.date.available2017-04-03T08:41:50Z
dc.date.available2017-04-11T11:37:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citation

Gleeson, K. (2016) 'Alleviating the ‘Miserable Condition’: Fitzjames Stephen and the Development of Modern Abortion Law', Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 8, pp. 48-67. Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/9039

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-149X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9039
dc.description.abstract

Contemporary English abortion law is now typically thought to be a development of the twentieth century, and little academic attention has been paid to its development before the 1938 case of R v Bourne or the Abortion Act 1967. Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s nineteenth century perspectives on pregnancy, abortion and the doctrine of necessity informing the basis of contemporary governance of abortion, child destruction, and infanticide as distinct from homicide, are often overlooked. Stephen understood abortion, child destruction and infanticide as distinct crimes with a common motivation and intention. The desperation of women to conceal or remedy the ‘miserable’ and emotionally destabilising condition of unplanned pregnancy typically defined each crime; the exception being cases of medical emergency during pregnancy which sometimes defined abortion and child destruction. Stephen argued that punishment required public assent and support in order to deter crime, and severe punishment in these cases rarely had either. In the twentieth century Stephen’s radical Victorian arguments to conceptualise abortion as a legitimate medical procedure (in the case of necessity), and to characterise child-killing as distinct from homicide, were finally effective: his model for law therefore informs contemporary English law in these areas.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectFitzjames Stephenen_US
dc.subjectAbortionen_US
dc.subjectAbortion Act 1967en_US
dc.subjectChild Destructionen_US
dc.subjectInfanticide Medical Procedureen_US
dc.subjectR v Bourneen_US
dc.titleAlleviating the ‘Miserable Condition’: Fitzjames Stephen and the Development of Modern Abortion Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV