Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRix, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-27T16:04:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T11:11:21Z
dc.date.available2017-03-27T16:04:38Z
dc.date.available2017-04-11T11:11:21Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citation

Rix, M. (2009) ' The Case of Dr. Mohammed Haneef: An 'Australian Terrorism' Drama with British Connections', Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 2, pp. 126-147. Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8951

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-149X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8951
dc.description.abstract

This article examines the treatment of Dr Mohamed Haneef, an Indian doctor arrested under Australia‟s anti-terrorism legislation in July 2007 as Australian authorities including the Australian Federal Police, Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, (wrongfully) believed that he was linked to the terrorist attack at Glasgow airport in June 2007. The actions and responses of these two agencies, and the subsequent judicial inquiry are reviewed in the light of the media‟s role and press coverage as the case unfolded.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAustralian anti-terrorism legislationen_US
dc.subjectClarke Judicial Inquiryen_US
dc.subjectGlasgow Airport attacken_US
dc.subjectCounter-terrorism Legislationen_US
dc.subjectCrimes Act 1914en_US
dc.titleThe Case of Dr. Mohammed Haneef: An 'Australian Terrorism' Drama with British Connectionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume2
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV