Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEnescu, Raluca
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Anja

Enescu,R. and Werner, A. (2016) 'The Legal Capacity of Deaf Persons in the Decisions of the Imperial Court of Justice between 1880 and 1900', Law, Crime and History, 6(2), pp.31-53. Available at:


The inclusion of deaf persons in a judicial setting raised questions about their ability to bear witness, be convicted, conclude a marriage, make a will and, of course, about the ability of the court to communicate with them. In their decisions, the judges of the Imperial Court of Justice in Leipzig shed light on their interpretation of the capacity of deaf persons to participate in the legal realm. The motivation of their judgments drew comparisons with different categories of citizens to compensate for incomplete laws. They also took into account developments in the education of deaf persons regarding their communication skills and mental capacity. The decisions illustrate that legal and scientific knowledge was closely linked to the effect that deaf persons were granted full legal capacity.

dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.subjectdeaf historyen_US
dc.subjectdeaf cultureen_US
dc.subjectlegal capacityen_US
dc.subjecthearing-impaired personsen_US
dc.subjectImperial Court of Justiceen_US
dc.titleThe Legal Capacity of Deaf Persons in the Decisions of the Imperial Court of Justice between 1880 and 1900en_US
plymouth.journalSOLON Law, Crime and History

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV