Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaminski, ERen
dc.contributor.authorBethune, CAen
dc.contributor.authorJones, RBen
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T09:03:13Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T09:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-17en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8728
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently in the United Kingdom (UK), there is a mismatch between limited financial resources and the large proportion of patients with suspected allergies actually being referred to specialist allergy clinics. To better understand the case mix of patients being referred, we audited referrals to a regional allergy service over an 8 year period.The main source of data was consultant letters to General Practitioners (GP) summarising the diagnosis of patients, archived from January 2002 to September 2009. Letters were reviewed, extracting the clinic date, doctor seen, gender, date of birth, postcode, GP, and diagnoses. Diagnoses were classified into seven groups and illustrative cases for each group noted. FINDINGS: Data from 2,028 new referrals with suspected allergy were analysed. The largest group of patients (43%) were diagnosed with a type I hypersensitivity. The other diagnostic groups were chronic idiopathic (spontaneous) urticaria (35%), suspected type I hypersensitivity but no allergen identified (8%), idiopathic (spontaneous) angioedema (8%), physical urticaria (2.5%), non-allergic symptoms (1.6%), type IV hypersensitivity (0.8%) and ACE inhibitor sensitivity (0.5%). Two thirds of patients seen were female with a higher percentage of female patients in the non type-I hypersensitivity group (71%) than the type 1 hypersensitivity (66%) (χ2 = 5.1, 1df, p = 0.024). The type 1 hypersensitivity patients were younger than other patients (38 Vs 46 years, t = -10.8, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the complexity of specialist allergy practice and the large proportion of patients referred with non-type I hypersensitivities, chronic idiopathic (spontaneous) urticaria being by far the largest group. Such information is critical to inform commissioning decisions, define referral pathways and in primary care education.

en
dc.format.extent103 - ?en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectAllergensen
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care Facilitiesen
dc.subjectAngioedemaen
dc.subjectAnti-Allergic Agentsen
dc.subjectClinical Auditen
dc.subjectDiagnosis-Related Groupsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectHypersensitivity, Immediateen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen
dc.subjectReferral and Consultationen
dc.subjectSex Factorsen
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen
dc.subjectUrticariaen
dc.titleComplexity of case mix in a regional allergy service.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22340023en
plymouth.volume5en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalBMC Res Notesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1756-0500-5-103en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health and Human Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health and Human Sciences/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
dc.publisher.placeEnglanden
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-02-17en
dc.identifier.eissn1756-0500en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/1756-0500-5-103en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2012-02-17en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV