Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorStewart, Iain Simpson
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Hazel Laura
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-02T09:57:39Z
dc.date.available2017-03-02T09:57:39Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier236443en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8578
dc.descriptionFor access to the full interview transcripts and photographs from Appendix 2 please contact the author: hazel.gibson@plymouth.ac.uken_US
dc.description.abstract

Geoscience operates at the boundary between two worlds; the visible and the invisible. Increasingly, new geological technologies such as hydraulic fracturing, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and radioactive waste disposal are drawing the public’s attention to the ‘invisible’ world of the geological subsurface. This presents unique communication challenges because these technologies exist in a realm that can never be physically seen. This thesis addresses this issue by examining the psychological perceptions of residents in three villages in the south west of England. A representative sample from each village was qualitatively interviewed and mental models were constructed from the resultant data using the ‘mental models’ technique (Morgan et al, 2002). The mental models were then quantitatively tested using a questionnaire to assess the perceptions that a broader sample of the residents of these locations hold towards the geological subsurface.

The results from the mental models assessment identified the principal perceptions held by the majority of the public surveyed. In particular, the study revealed the connection between the visible surface and the invisible subsurface and how different participants engaged with that boundary; choosing either a geoscience-centric or an anthropocentric approach to penetrating the surface. These approaches utilised by non-experts differed from those employed by the experts, who used a regionally specific geoscience-centric approach to visualising the subsurface. The work provides an important empirical baseline from which to develop a science-led strategy to engage the general public with new technologies and to increase our understanding of the more broadly held conceptions of the invisible subsurface.

en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.subjectGeocognitionen_US
dc.subjectGeocommunicationen_US
dc.subjectGeological subsurfaceen_US
dc.subjectGeologyen_US
dc.subjectGeoscienceen_US
dc.subjectGeoscience cognitionen_US
dc.subjectGeoscience communicationen_US
dc.subjectMental modelsen_US
dc.subjectPublic perceptionen_US
dc.subjectPublic understanding of scienceen_US
dc.subjectDevonen_US
dc.subjectCornwallen_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.subjectScience communicationen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhDen_US
dc.titleUnderground Britain: public perceptions of the geological subsurfaceen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionpublishableen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/376
dc.provenanceAn issue reported on 25.06.2018 re problem downloading this large file (PU274456). Requested file to compress but no response received from author.
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargoen_US
dc.type.qualificationDoctorateen_US
rioxxterms.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.project1222755en_US
rioxxterms.versionNA
plymouth.orcid.id0000-0003-1496-0996en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV