Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFisher, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorWay, S
dc.contributor.authorChenery-Morris, S
dc.contributor.authorJackson, J
dc.contributor.authorBower, H
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T17:27:42Z
dc.date.available2017-03-01T17:27:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.issn1471-5953
dc.identifier.issn1873-5223
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8577
dc.description.abstract

AIM: To reduce variations in grading of midwifery practice and enhance reliability of assessment. BACKGROUND: The first phase of a national project showed there to be widely ranging interpretation and application of professional educational standards in relation to grading of practice in midwifery. This raised concerns about reliability and equity of professional assessment. The second phase therefore sought to achieve consensus on a set of core principles. METHODS: A participatory action research process in two stages, using a Mini-Delphi approach. Educational leads from all 55 institutions delivering midwifery programmes nationally were invited to participate. Stage one: Questionnaire comprising 12 statements drawn from the findings of the initial phase of the project. Stage two: Face-to-face discussion. FINDINGS: Statements were categorised based on questionnaire responses: 1) Consensus, 2) Staged consensus, 2) Minor modifications, 4) Controversial. Consensus was achieved on 11 core principles through group discussion; only one was omitted from the final set. RECOMMENDATIONS: All midwifery programmes nationally to incorporate the agreed core principles. Findings should be disseminated to the regulatory body to help inform changes to midwifery and nursing educational standards. The core principles may also contribute to curriculum development in midwifery and other professions internationally.

dc.format.extent54-60
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectGrading
dc.subjectPractice
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectMidwifery
dc.subjectProfessional
dc.subjectParticipatory action research
dc.titleCore principles to reduce current variations that exist in grading of midwifery practice in the United Kingdom
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000398876200009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume23
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalNurse Education in Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.006
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeScotland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-02-08
dc.rights.embargodate2018-2-10
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5223
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.006
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV