Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGill, FJ
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, GD
dc.contributor.authorGrech, C
dc.contributor.authorBoldy, D
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-21T09:48:19Z
dc.date.available2017-01-21T09:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.identifier.issn0022-0124
dc.identifier.issn1938-2472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8277
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background:</jats:title> <jats:p>Nurses working in critical care often undertake specialty education. There are no uniform practice outcomes for critical care programs, and consumer input to practice standards has been lacking.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title> <jats:p>A structured multiphase project was undertaken to develop practice standards and an assessment tool informed by critical care nursing stakeholders as well as patients and families—the Standards of Practice and Evaluation of Critical-Care-Nursing Tool (SPECT).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>Testing of the SPECT revealed adequate content validity index (CVI), domain CVI (range, 0.772 to 0.887), and statement CVI (range, 0.66 to 1.00). Reliability was adequate in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α &gt; 0.864) and test-retest Spearman rank correlation (range, 0.772 to 0.887); intra-rater kappa agreement was significant for 102 of 104 statements with moderate agreement for 94.2% of statements.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title> <jats:p>The SPECT appears to have clinical feasibility, preliminary validity and reliability, and provides a clear definition for the expected practice level for graduates of a critical care education program.</jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:italic>J Contin Educ Nurs.</jats:italic> 2014;45(7):312–320. </jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent312-320
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSLACK, Inc.
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCritical Care Nursing
dc.subjectCurriculum
dc.subjectEducation, Nursing, Continuing
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectModels, Educational
dc.subjectProgram Development
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.titleDeveloping and Testing the Standard of Practice and Evaluation of Critical-Care-Nursing Tool (SPECT) for Critical Care Nursing Practice
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000344970500008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue7
plymouth.volume45
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalThe Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing
dc.identifier.doi10.3928/00220124-20140620-02
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-04-16
dc.identifier.eissn1938-2472
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3928/00220124-20140620-02
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2014-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV