Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKent, Ben
dc.contributor.authorRedley, Ben
dc.contributor.authorWickramasinghe, Nen
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Len
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, NJen
dc.contributor.authorMoghimi, Hen
dc.contributor.authorBotti, Men
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T18:34:10Z
dc.date.available2016-12-16T18:34:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-08en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8141
dc.description.abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore nurses' reactions to new novel technology for acute health care. BACKGROUND: Past failures of technology developers to deliver products that meet nurses' needs have led to resistance and reluctance in the technology adoption process. Thus, involving nurses in a collaborative process from early conceptualisation serves to inform design reflective upon current clinical practice, facilitating the cementing of 'vision' and expectations of the technology. DESIGN: An exploratory descriptive design to capture nurses' immediate impressions. METHODS: Four focus groups (52 nurses from medical and surgical wards at two hospitals in Australia; one private and one public). RESULTS: Nursing reactions towards the new technology illustrated a variance in barrier and enabler comments across multiple domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Most challenging for nurses were the perceived threat to their clinical skill, and the potential capability of the novel technology to capture their clinical workflow. Enabling reactions included visions that this could help integrate care between departments; help management and support of nursing processes; and coordinating their patients care between clinicians. Nurses' reactions differed across hospital sites, influenced by their experiences of using technology. For example, Site 1 nurses reported wide variability in their distribution of barrier and enabling comments and nurses at Site 2, where technology was prevalent, reported mostly positive responses. CONCLUSION: This early involvement offered nursing input and facilitated understanding of the potential capabilities of novel technology to support nursing work, particularly the characteristics seen as potentially beneficial (enabling technology) and those conflicting (barrier technology) with the delivery of both safe and effective patient care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Collaborative involvement of nurses from the early conceptualisation of technology development brings benefits that increase the likelihood of successful use of a tool intended to support the delivery of safe and efficient patient care.

en
dc.format.extent2340 - 2351en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectacute careen
dc.subjectdesign scienceen
dc.subjectinformation systemsen
dc.subjectnurses’ reactionsen
dc.subjectnursing informaticsen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Careen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFocus Groupsen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMedical Records Systems, Computerizeden
dc.subjectNursesen
dc.subjectVictoriaen
dc.subjectWorkplaceen
dc.titleExploring nurses' reactions to a novel technology to support acute health care delivery.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041122en
plymouth.issue15-16en
plymouth.volume24en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalJ Clin Nursen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.12881en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health and Human Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health and Human Sciences/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
dc.publisher.placeEnglanden
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-04-16en
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2702en
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 monthsen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jocn.12881en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-08en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV