Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOliver, Sarah Ann
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Arts, Humanities and Businessen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-26T14:39:34Z
dc.date.available2011-09-26T14:39:34Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifierNot availableen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/716
dc.description.abstract

The thesis is an examination of Mary Hays's first and second novels, The Memoirs of Emma Courtney (1796) and The Victim of Prejudice (1799) in order to claim a reworking of political and gender constructions of women that underwrite rape narratives produced in the Long Eighteenth Century. To discuss ways in which Hays's novels challenge the assumptions and constructions of femininity disseminated in earlier rape texts I have selected examples of polemic and narratives written between the 1670s and the 1790s together with some of the contemporary Radical texts which exhibit similar concerns and views expressed in the writer's feminist tracts and novels. I argue that Hays's gender politics are closely related to the issues played out in both novels. That is, The Memoirs of Emma Courtney is a protest against contemporary views of `femininity' and a sustained and rational argument for female sexual desire rather than feminine `depravity' or `madness'. The Victim of Prejudice asserts that although society's reaction to rape ensures dire consequences for the violated women her sexuality is not necessarily responsible for her rape. Hence, the view of women advanced in Hays's first novel is crucial to an understanding of issues raised in the refashioning of the rape episode in the second.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.titleThe rape of Mary Raymond : a radical view of rape in Mary Hays's The Memoirs of Emma Courtney and The Victim of Prejudiceen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/1544


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV