Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAl-Shafi, Nasser Mubarak Shafi
dc.contributor.otherPlymouth Business Schoolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-26T13:52:33Z
dc.date.available2011-09-26T13:52:33Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifierNot availableen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/709
dc.descriptionMerged with duplicate record 10026.1/442 on 01.02.2017 by CS (TIS)
dc.description.abstract

The focus of this thesis is an investigation of the post-privatisation performance of the international telecoms sector. Firstly, the general hypothesis (1) of this thesis has been pursued, which states that the privatised telecoms companies perform differently from their non-privatised (private) counterparts. Several tests were applied; namely, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. The principal finding was that there was no significant difference in performance. Secondly, the next hypothesis (2) states that the financial performance of each company is positively related to that of the other two selected companies. For this purpose, multiple regression tests were performed to investigate any inter-relationships between BT, AT&T and NTT. It was found that the performance of each was affected by the other companies. Thirdly, the next hypothesis (3) states that, in a global market, company performance is related more closely to the sector than to each respective stock market. It was found that performance was affected more significantly by their respective stock markets than by competitor global players. Fourthly, the next hypothesis (4) states that, in terms of competitive advantage, NTT exhibits through time a superior position compared with BT and AT&T on account of its monopoly position. It was found that monopoly was not an issue. Fifthly, the next hypothesis (5) states that, of the three global players, AT&T is more adversely affected in its competitive advantage on account of its having a weaker monopoly position. It was found that AT&T had a competitive advantage from 1990 to 1993. BT took the lead until 2000, then NTT forged ahead after the Japanese market started to become more liberalised in terms of competition. Original tests were performed regarding the changing degree of competitive advantage of these three companies. This required an evaluation of the relationship between competitive advantage and priceearnings inverses, capital asset pricing model derived rates of return and dividend-based rates of return. A random walk with drift model was also applied, in order to evaluate forecasted trends. Finally, BT's short-term debt-financing problems were examined. To overcome these difficulties, BT raised funds via a rights issue, selling off Yell and other profitable assets and de-merged their mobile company. It was found that the strategic risk probability of a failed rights issue was quite small.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipState of Qatar- Ministry of Education, Qatar
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectFinance
dc.subjectTaxation
dc.subjectPrivatisation
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectManagement
dc.titleThe international telecommunications sector : a financial investigation of post privatisation performanceen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4843
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4843


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV