Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurr, Steven
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, Arunangsu
dc.contributor.authorGibson, S
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, L
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, S
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T23:05:31Z
dc.date.available2016-09-20T23:05:31Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-16
dc.identifier.issn2382-1205
dc.identifier.issn2382-1205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5466
dc.description.abstract

here are strong pedagogical arguments in favor of adopting computer-based assessment. The risks of technical failure can be managed and are offset by improvements in cost-effectiveness and quality assurance capability. Academic, administrative, and technical leads at an appropriately senior level within an institution need to be identified, so that they can act as effective advocates. All stakeholder groups need to be represented in undertaking a detailed appraisal of requirements and shortlisting software based on core functionality, summative assessment life cycle needs, external compatibility, security, and usability. Any software that is a candidate for adoption should be trialed under simulated summative conditions, with all stakeholders having a voice in agreeing the optimum solution. Transfer to a new system should be carefully planned and communicated, with a programme of training established to maximize the success of adoption.

dc.format.extent77-77
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectcomputer-based
dc.subjectelectronic
dc.subjectlife cycle
dc.subjectoptions appraisal
dc.titleKey points to facilitate the adoption of computer-based assessments.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typearticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349322
plymouth.volume3
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://www.la-press.com/article.php?article_id=5694
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
dc.identifier.doi10.4137/JMECD.S20379
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-15
dc.identifier.eissn2382-1205
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.4137/JMECD.S20379
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-06-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV