Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGanis, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorBridges, D
dc.contributor.authorHsu, C-W
dc.contributor.authorSchendan, Haline
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-18T08:36:53Z
dc.date.available2016-09-18T08:36:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119
dc.identifier.issn1095-9572
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5459
dc.descriptionpublisher: Elsevier articletitle: Is anterior N2 enhancement a reliable electrophysiological index of concealed information? journaltitle: NeuroImage articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.042 content_type: article copyright: © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstract

Concealed information tests (CITs) are used to determine whether an individual possesses information about an item of interest. Event-related potential (ERP) measures in CITs have focused almost exclusively on the P3b component, showing that this component is larger when lying about the item of interest (probe) than telling the truth about control items (irrelevants). Recent studies have begun to examine other ERP components, such as the anterior N2, with mixed results. A seminal CIT study found that visual probes elicit a larger anterior N2 than irrelevants (Gamer and Berti, 2010) and suggested that this component indexes cognitive control processes engaged when lying about probes. However, this study did not control for potential intrinsic differences among the stimuli: the same probe and irrelevants were used for all participants, and there was no control condition composed of uninformed participants. Here, first we show that the N2 effect found in the study by Gamer and Berti (2010) was in large part due to stimulus differences, as the effect observed in a concealed information condition was comparable to that found in two matched control conditions without any concealed information (Experiments 1 and 2). Next, we addressed the issue of the generality of the N2 findings by counterbalancing a new set of stimuli across participants and by using a control condition with uninformed participants (Experiment 3). Results show that the probe did not elicit a larger anterior N2 than the irrelevants under these controlled conditions. These findings suggest that caution should be taken in using the N2 as an index of concealed information in CITs. Furthermore, they are a reminder that results of CIT studies (not only with ERPs) performed without stimulus counterbalancing and suitable control conditions may be confounded by differential intrinsic properties of the stimuli employed.

dc.format.extent152-165
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectEvent-related potentials
dc.subjectN2
dc.subjectConcealed information
dc.subjectDeception
dc.subjectCognitive control
dc.titleIs anterior N2 enhancement a reliable electrophysiological index of concealed information?
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000389683000014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume143
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalNeuroImage
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.042
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Brain
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-08-19
dc.rights.embargodate2017-8-26
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9572
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 months
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.042
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderCogNovo: Cognitive Innovation::Research Executive Agency European Union FP7
plymouth.funderCogNovo: Cognitive Innovation::Research Executive Agency European Union FP7


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV