Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorSkirton, Heather
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Celine
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-19T11:54:14Z
dc.date.available2011-08-19T11:54:14Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier10126950en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/543
dc.descriptionGenet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010 Dec;14(6):807-15. Epub 2010 Oct 12. Living without a diagnosis: the parental experience. Lewis C, Skirton H, Jones R.J Genet Couns. 2011 Feb;20(1):80-97. Epub 2010 Sep 29. Can we make assumptions about the psychosocial impact of living as a carrier, based on studies assessing the effects of carrier testing? Lewis C, Skirton H, Jones R.en_US
dc.description.abstract

The effect of psychosocial information resources on the psychological impact of genetic testing for patients

Background: The genetic testing process has been shown to have a profound psychosocial impact on patients and families, yet research suggests that there is a lack of practical and helpful psychosocial information written to support decision-making. Ideally, this should be available for use both before and after genetic testing and should be easily accessed through genetic clinics. The development of pre-written leaflets or on-line resources which draw on the experiences and advice of families who have been through similar experiences, and are readily available through genetic clinics, might be one way of helping families make necessary adjustments. Aim: The aim of this study was to develop information resources for a) people undergoing carrier testing, and b) parents of children with undiagnosed conditions, and to pilot the use of these resources with service users. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify key themes to inform the content of the resources. To build on these findings, in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 people who had undergone carrier testing and 14 parents of children without a diagnosis. Interview data were analysed using the grounded theory method. A grey literature search of existing patient information was also conducted. These three phases informed the content of information resources. The development process also included input from genetic specialists, patient group representatives and interviewees. Finally, a pilot study was conducted through three genetic centres to assess the feasibility of a study testing the use of the resources. Findings: The participants in this study were striving for empowerment: carriers sought reproductive empowerment; parents developed empowerment strategies in order to advocate for their child. Moreover, a theory named ‘reconstructing the meaning of being a parent’ was constructed to describe the experience of parenting a child for whom no clear care pathway existed. The importance of providing timely information was identified as being a key factor in supporting parents during their search for a diagnosis. A new model was built to summarise the overarching experience of participants in this study. Conclusions: Empowerment was identified as a dynamic and multi-faceted construct. Health professionals and support groups can help facilitate the empowerment process through the provision of timely psychosocial information. This is particularly important in an age when patients are expected to take greater control than ever before over decisions affecting their healthcare.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectGenetic testingen_US
dc.subjectGenetic counselling
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectPatient information
dc.subjectPsychosocial
dc.subjectMixed Methods
dc.titleThe effect of psychosocial information resources on the psychological impact of genetic testing for patientsen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/1467
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/1467


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV