Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, M
dc.contributor.authorSloan, L
dc.contributor.authorCheung, SY
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Carole
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorRunham, L
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-14T16:01:32Z
dc.date.available2016-07-14T16:01:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.issn0038-0385
dc.identifier.issn1469-8684
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5062
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p> This paper reports on a quasi-experiment in which quantitative methods (QM) are embedded within a substantive sociology module. Through measuring student attitudes before and after the intervention alongside control group comparisons, we illustrate the impact that embedding has on the student experience. Our findings are complex and even contradictory. Whilst the experimental group were less likely to be distrustful of statistics and appreciate how QM inform social research, they were also less confident about their statistical abilities, suggesting that through ‘doing’ quantitative sociology the experimental group are exposed to the intricacies of method and their optimism about their own abilities is challenged. We conclude that embedding QM in a single substantive module is not a ‘magic bullet’ and that a wider programme of content and assessment diversification across the curriculum is preferential. </jats:p>

dc.format.extent435-452
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectembedding
dc.subjectpedagogy
dc.subjectquantitative methods
dc.subjectquasi-experiments
dc.subjectteaching
dc.titleCan’t Count or Won’t Count? Embedding Quantitative Methods in Substantive Sociology Curricula: A Quasi-Experiment
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000377141600004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume50
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalSociology
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0038038515587652
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/PS - Academic Partnerships
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy MANUAL
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8684
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/0038038515587652
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV