Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCandy, E
dc.contributor.authorHaworth‐Booth, S
dc.contributor.authorKnight‐Davis, M
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-07T15:19:15Z
dc.date.available2016-06-07T15:19:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.issn1478-2189
dc.identifier.issn1557-0681
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4844
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The present service evaluation aimed to assess patients’ experience of the musculoskeletal interface (MSKI) team, evaluate the outcomes of referrals to secondary care and determine if patients returned to secondary musculoskeletal (MSK) care following discharge from the MSKI team.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Excel spreadsheets were designed for data capture. The survey was undertaken in June 2012. Patients were invited to complete and return the questionnaire. Data were collated and reported. Clinicians were given a list of patient identification numbers for those they had referred to secondary care. Using the patient electronic record system, they checked the outcome as recorded and entered data onto the spreadsheet. Patients who had been discharged between December 2011 and November 2012 were identified, their cases were reviewed and data were entered onto the spreadsheet. The information was then collated and reported.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In June 2012, 415 patients attended clinics, of whom 231 (56%) responded to the patient experience survey. On average, 206 (89%) patients agreed that they were satisfied or highly satisfied with their clinic experience. A total of 2,362 (89%) discharges were reviewed; 1,565 patients (61%) were discharged to their general practitioner (GP) and not referred back to a secondary care surgical or medical service, of these 21% were referred to secondary care by the MSKI team. By 2014, a total of 286 patients had been referred to secondary care by their GP following discharge but only 54 (2%) of whom returned for secondary care assessment for the same condition. Between December 2011 and November 2012, 620 (26%) patients seen in clinic were referred to secondary care; 462 (75%) were referred to orthopaedic surgeons, 66 (11%) to the orthopaedic physician, 44 (8%) to the pain clinic and 48 (1%) to ‘other‘, including neurology, rheumatology, etc.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Physiotherapy‐led multi‐professional teams provide effective management of MSK conditions, and the majority of patients are satisfied with their care. A year to 18 months year following discharge, only 2% of patients returned for secondary care assessment for the same condition. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent185-191
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal
dc.subjecteffectiveness
dc.subjectpatient experience survey
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subjectPatient Care Team
dc.subjectPatient Satisfaction
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Specialty
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.titleReview of the Effectiveness of a Consultant Physiotherapy‐Led Musculoskeletal Interface Team: A Welsh Experience
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605463
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume14
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalMusculoskeletal Care
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/msc.1122
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn1557-0681
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/msc.1122
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV