Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorClibbens, John
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Penelope Ann
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Psychologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-13T10:04:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-16T12:39:46Z
dc.date.available2011-05-13T10:04:16Z
dc.date.available2011-09-16T12:39:46Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifierNot availableen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/455
dc.descriptionMetadata merged with duplicate record (http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/568) on 20.12.2016 by CS (TIS).
dc.descriptionThis is a digitised version of a thesis that was deposited in the University Library. If you are the author please contact PEARL Admin (pearladmin@plymouth.ac.uk) to discuss options.
dc.description.abstract

The goal of the research was to discover which type of input and instruction best facilitates the acquisition of syntax in adult learners. An artificial miniature language was used to model real second language to control precisely the type of input, conditions of exposure and instruction accompanying that input. Performance of learners under four input conditions was compared and analogies were drawn between these conditions and those experienced by adult second language learners (L2 learners). "Instructed" learners Z): like formally instructed L2 learners were systematically taught the rules of the language. "Exposure" learners saw example sentences and were asked to search for rules, the conditions of their input analogous to that of "naturalistic" L2 learners who receive no formal instruction but who make conscious efforts to search for rules. "Memorisation" learners received the same input as that presented to the exposure learners but were asked to memorise the sentencesT. hey were seena s analogoust o naturalistic L2 learners who do not search for the rules and the conditions of input were modelled on those claimed to induce implicit learning. "Cued" learners received input which contained cross-sentential cues to underlying phrasal structure. They were modelled on naturalistic learners whose input contains such cues and who make efforts to search for rules. Performance was compared on both grammaticality judgement and free production tasks. No overall superiority in performance was observed for any of the input conditions. An interaction between input type and rule complexity was evident in which the amount of information received regarding the rules related positively to performance on. the less salient, more complex rules. It was proposed that the findings could be explained in terms of a "noticing" hypothesis, in which noticing of features is considered a pre-requisite for acquisition. Theories of second and artificial language learning which have stipulated that complex rules can only be learned implicitly were not supported.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectSecond language learningen_US
dc.titleAcquisition of syntax in a minature artificial language : effects of input and instructionen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4166
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4166


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV