Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.contributor.authorvan Goudoever, JB
dc.contributor.authorDuivenvoorden, HJ
dc.contributor.authorAlbers, MJIJ
dc.contributor.authorvan Dam, NAM
dc.contributor.authorDullaart, E
dc.contributor.authorvan Heerde, M
dc.contributor.authorde Neef, M
dc.contributor.authorVerlaat, CWM
dc.contributor.authorvan Vught, EM
dc.contributor.authorHazelzet, JA
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T11:01:37Z
dc.date.available2016-01-08T11:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.identifier.issn0342-4642
dc.identifier.issn1432-1238
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4185
dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: To construct and test the reliability and validity of the EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care (EMPATHIC) questionnaire measuring parent satisfaction in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). METHODS: Structured development and psychometric testing of a parent satisfaction-with-care instrument with the results of two cohorts of parents (n = 2,046) from eight PICUs in the Netherlands. RESULTS: In the first cohort, 667/1,055 (63%) parents participated followed by 551/991 (56%) parents in the second cohort. The empirical structure of the instrument was established by confirmatory factor analysis with the first sample of parents confirming 65 statements within five theoretically conceptualized domains: information, care and cure, organization, parental participation, and professional attitude. The standardized factor loadings were greater than 0.40 in 63 statements. Cronbach's α, a measure of reliability, per domain ranged from 0.73 to 0.93 in both cohorts with no significant difference documenting the reliability over time. Beside rigorous content and face validity, the congruent validity of the instrument showed adequate correlation with four gold standard questions measuring overall satisfaction. The non-differential validity was confirmed with no significant differences between the population characteristics and the domains, except that parents with a child for a surgical admission were more satisfied on information issues. CONCLUSIONS: The final EMPATHIC questionnaire incorporates 65 statements. The empirical structure of the satisfaction statements and domains was satisfactory. The reliability and validity proved to be adequate. The EMPATHIC questionnaire is a valid quality performance indicator to measure quality of care as perceived by parents.

dc.format.extent310-318
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectFamily satisfaction
dc.subjectParents
dc.subjectCare
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectValidity
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.subjectQuality of care
dc.titleConstruction and psychometric testing of the EMPATHIC questionnaire measuring parent satisfaction in the pediatric intensive care unit
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.typeValidation Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000286633500017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume37
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalIntensive Care Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00134-010-2042-y
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-07-26
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1238
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00134-010-2042-y
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2011-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV