Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJames, MNen
dc.contributor.authorNewby, Men
dc.contributor.authorDoubell, Pen
dc.contributor.authorHattingh, DGen
dc.contributor.authorSerasli, Ken
dc.contributor.authorSmith, DJen
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-19T16:18:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-19T16:20:50Z
dc.date.available2015-11-19T16:18:05Z
dc.date.available2015-11-19T16:20:50Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-15en
dc.identifier.issn0029-5493en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3824
dc.description.abstract

The inner surface of ferritic steel reactor pressure vessels (RPV) is clad with strip welded austenitic stainless steel primarily to increase the long-term corrosion resistance of the ferritic vessel. The strip welding process used in the cladding operation induces significant residual stresses in the clad layer and in the RPV steel substrate, arising both from the thermal cycle and from the very different thermal and mechanical properties of the austenitic clad layer and the ferritic RPV steel. This work measures residual stresses using the deep hole drilling (DHD) and neutron diffraction (ND) techniques and compares residual stress data obtained by the two methods in a stainless clad coupon of A533B Class 2 steel. The results give confidence that both techniques are capable of assessing the trends in residual stresses, and their magnitudes. Significant differences are that the ND data shows greater values of the tensile stress peaks (∼100 MPa) than the DHD data but has a higher systematic error associated with it. The stress peaks are sharper with the ND technique and also differ in spatial position by around 1 mm compared with the DHD technique. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.

en
dc.format.extent56 - 65en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3822
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/3822
dc.titleWeld residual stresses near the bimetallic interface in clad RPV steel: A comparison between deep-hole drilling and neutron diffraction dataen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.volume274en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalNuclear Engineering and Designen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.042en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.042en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV