Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhitehead, PG
dc.contributor.authorFutter, MN
dc.contributor.authorComber, Sean
dc.contributor.authorButterfield, D
dc.contributor.authorPope, L
dc.contributor.authorWillows, R
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, C
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-10T16:44:59Z
dc.date.available2015-11-10T16:44:59Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.identifier.issn0029-1277
dc.identifier.issn2224-7955
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3790
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>The issues of diffuse and point source phosphorus (P) pollution in river systems are presented using a catchment model to assess nutrient behaviour, seasonal effluent standards and biosolid substitution. A process-based, dynamic water quality model (INCA-P) has been applied to four UK catchments, namely, the Rivers Tywi, Wensum, Lunan and Hampshire Avon, to simulate water fluxes, sediments, total phosphorus and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations. The model has been used to assess impacts of both agricultural runoff and point P sources from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) on water quality. With increasing costs for P fertilizer and P reduction at WWTPs, a strategy of recycling P from WWTPs as biosolids to substitute for fertilizers in vulnerable catchments has been investigated. Significant reductions in P concentrations are achieved if this substitution were implemented on a large scale. Reductions in SRP of between 6% and 41% can be achieved using this strategy. The effects of implementing new WWTP standards are shown to reduce SRP by 30%. Seasonal consent standards applied in only summer months could reduce SRP by 53% and achieve a substantial reduction in treatment costs year round.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent313-324
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIWA Publishing
dc.subject6 Clean Water and Sanitation
dc.titleModelling impacts of seasonal wastewater treatment plant effluent permits and biosolid substitution for phosphorus management in catchments and river systems
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume46
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalHydrology Research
dc.identifier.doi10.2166/nh.2014.100
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA06 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/BEACh
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn2224-7955
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.2166/nh.2014.100
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV