Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Rebecca Kate
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.identifiernot availableen_US

This thesis is an exercise in discursive psychology. The body of discourse analysed concerns the defence of rural space against New Travellers. In contrast to previous sociological and human geographical work in this area, instead of newspaper articles and Parliamentary discourse, participants' talk and texts are the starting point for the - investigation. The data corpora have been generated from a variety of sources: Focus group discussions with police officers; interviews with landowners (or their representatives); letters to the editors of local newspapers; and private letters of complaint to a local council. The thesis focuses on the participants' selection of locational formulations, the work this has taken, and how this work partly constitutes interactional business. The thesis makes a distinctive contribution to several different areas. This includes offering a disciplinary critique of how humanist geographers and environmental psychologists have constructed attachment to place as the norm, whilst problematising high residential mobility. Without taking up a position in this debate the thesis demonstrates how a discursive approach an offer a different perspective on place discourse- including the way that place identity / attachment might be reconceived and studied. The first two analytic chapters provide a distinctive contribution to discursive psychology by bringing together, and building on, previous work around the analysis of Abstract place discourse. Chapter five demonstrates participants' use of location as a domain of warrant for making complaints about New Travellers. Chapter six demonstrates how participants used spatial descriptions to construct New Travellers as transgressive or literally 'out-of-place'. The third and final analytic chapter, chapter seven provides a contribution to social psychology by demonstrating citizenship in practice. The project concludes by considering these contributions and their implications, and outlining several reasons for further work on the discursive psychology of place. The thorny issues raised by a focus on place, such as realism vs relativism are also discussed.

dc.description.sponsorshipthe Department of Psychology, University of Plymouthen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectRural space
dc.subjectRural space, defence of
dc.subjectRealism vs relativism
dc.subjectAttachment to place
dc.subjectDiscursive psychologyen_US
dc.titleLosing ground : locational formulations in argumentation over New Travellersen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV