Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorBeaumont, Emily
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Eleanor Molly
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-19T16:48:58Z
dc.date.available2015-08-19T16:48:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10172029en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3529
dc.descriptionChapter 3 has been published as conference proceedings in the Journal of Coastal Research, and Chapter 4 has been published in the International Journal of Aquatic Research and Educationen_US
dc.description.abstract

Rip currents present a severe hazard to water users worldwide, resulting in over 100 drownings and thousands of lifeguard rescues annually. This thesis examines the demographics of who is effected by rip currents in the UK, what activity they are undertaking, when and where incidents occur, how much the public know, what people have experienced, and how best to educate them. Analysis of 7909 rip current lifeguard rescues (16777 people) across the UK between 2006-2013 highlighted the most at risk group, and subsequent target audience for education, to be male teenagers aged between 13-17 years old (n=2906, 17%). Geographically, the highest incidents occurred on the beaches in the Southwest of England (n=6911, 87%). Incidents mostly occurred outside of lifeguard flagged areas (n=4302, 54%) and mainly involved those using bodyboards (n=5290, 52%). Through the analysis of 407 public beach-based rip current and beach safety questionnaires, it was established that beach users have a poor understanding of rip currents (n=263, 65%) but a good perception of the beach safety flags (n=389, 96%). People with greater knowledge were typically educated by a lifeguard, enter the sea more frequently or have been caught in rip currents themselves. The experiences of 553 people caught in rip currents were analysed using an online questionnaire. The gender split was 69% male (n= 382) to 31% female (n= 171), indicating that males are caught in rip currents more than females. Swimming directly to shore against the rip followed an initial panic (n=108, 34%) for most people caught in a rip. Swimming parallel to the beach was the most remembered, advised, utilised, and promoted safety message. Respondents advocated the use of lifeguards to disseminate rip current safety messages. A new and unique rip current education programme was developed from the synthesis of these results. A lifeguard delivered a pilot programme to 185 teenagers in three schools and two community groups in the Southwest of England. This interactive pilot consisted of exercises using videos, photographs, news reports, and a swimming machine. Levels of rip current knowledge were evaluated before and after, and at regular intervals, to assess knowledge retention. The short-term effects after 3 months were positive, showing statistically significant (p<0.0005) improvements in mean knowledge levels. This thesis provides a new contribution to the expanding field of social and behavioural rip current research. The development of a unique rip current education programme presents an alternative method for increasing public awareness, and supports the worldwide prevention of rip current incidents and fatalities.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal National Lifeboat Institution and The Marine Instituteen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlymouth Universityen_US
dc.subjectRip currenten_US
dc.subjectBeach safetyen_US
dc.subjectBeach lifeguardsen_US
dc.subjectPublic educationen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen_US
dc.titleRip currents in the UK: incident analysis, public awareness, and educationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/1321


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV